To investigate the criminal conduct of all institutions, organizations, and individuals involved in the persecution of Falun Gong; to bring such investigations, no matter how long it takes, no matter how far and deep we have to search, to full closure; to exercise fundamental principles of humanity; and to restore and uphold justice in society.

Interviews by Huang Jiefu Provided New Evidence of China’s Organ Procurement from Prisoners of Conscience

April 6, 2015
A4 format download

In March 2015, China’s unofficial spokesperson on organ transplant, Huang Jiefu, gave multiple interviews in an attempt to promote China’s announcement of ending using prisoners’ organs. On the contrary, these interviews revealed more shocking evidence that China has been covering up its unethical organ procurement practice from prisoners of conscience.

This report provides excerpts and analysis of two interviews in March 2015.

March 13: “I have never seen the 1984 Regulation, how could you?”

On March 13, 2015, Huang Jiefu was asked to comment on the regulation enacted in 1984, which has been regarded as the official regulation on the usage of organs from executed prisoners in China.

The reporter made a comment that the Provisional Regulations on the Use of the Death Penalty Criminals or Cadaveric Organ of the Body of Criminals, which was enacted in 1984, has not been abolished today. Huang Jiefu questioned the reporter, “this provision is a secret, and I have not seen it before, why are you able to see it?”

Below is the original text in Chinese and its English translation. The entire interview in Chinese can be found here. It is archived here.


Reporter: Like before, we are all very concerned about the use of organs from executed prisoners. There are a lot of comments mentioning an Interim Provisions "Provisional Regulations on the Use of the Death Penalty Criminals or Cadaveric Organ of the Body of Criminals", enacted in 1984. This provision has not been abolished even now.

Huang Jiefu: Look to the future, the 1984 document is not a law, this provision is a secret, and I have not seen it before, why are you able to see it? That is not the law, at the state open level, on the government level, there has never been an acknowledgement that the use of organs from executed prisoners is legal, it is an embarrassing page, it is drinking poison to quench one’s thirst, it is expedient. Now we have the sunny system, why do you always want to abolish something? Who recognized the 1984 document?

Original in Chinese:



Although not a law, the 1984 regulation is the only basis to permit the use of executed prisoners' organs, and even Huang, the highest ranked official in China’s transplantation business hadn't seen it, the procurement of prisoners’ organsafter execution is obviously not legally regulated and thus should be consider unlawful in China.

March 16: Using prisoners organs a “filthy and forbidden area” caused by China’s former Security Czar

During the March 16, 2015 interview with Phoenix TV, Huang Jiefu mentioned that using prisoners’ organs has been a “filthy, intractable, sensitive and forbidden area.” Moreover, for the first time on record, he blamed Zhou Yongkang, now arrested Chinese security czar, for making the organ procurement from prisoners a profit chain. The entire interview in Chinese can be found here and the archived version here.

Below is the relevant content.


Xu Gehui (reporter with pro-Beijing Phoenix Television): In the midst of all this there must be every kind of entanglement, intertwining of interests, and a profit chain, so it would have become very filthy.

Huang Jiefu: It became filthy, it became murky and intractable, it became an extremely sensitive, extremely complicated area, basically a forbidden area. Last year was the most crucial year.

Huang Jiefu: 2014 was the transitional test period for Chinese organ transplantation. We really thank the Party Central State Council for having the kind of attitude and atmosphere. What was this atmosphere? Anti-corruption. If there was no “attacking the tigers and smashing the flies” (the so-called anti-corruption campaign), we wouldn't be here today abolishing the system (of taking organs from executed prisoners). You know what I'm saying? So the domestic and international environment, especially the climate of anti-corruption, clean government, that's the only way we were able to publicize this.

XuGehui: Why, after attacking the big tiger, were you able to overturn this system of using executed prisoner organs? Who is this big tiger, after all?

Huang Jiefu: It's just too clear. Everyone knows the big tiger. Zhou Yongkang is the big tiger; Zhou Yongkang was the chief of Political & Legal Affairs Committee, originally a member of the Politburo Standing Committee. Everyone knows this. There are newspapers every day talking about his background. So as for where executed prisoner organs come from, isn't it very clear? Actually, this work received the support from the previous General Secretary, Hu Jintao, and premier Wen Jiabao, and currently serving Xi Jinping and premier Li Keqiang's support. Otherwise we couldn't have done this.

Original text in Chinese:






What is worthy of noting is that the organ procurement from prisoners expanded under the leadership of Jiang Zemin, and has not been stopped by the subsequent two CCP leaders namely, the former General Secretary Hu Jintao, former Premier Wen Jiabao, current General Secretary Xi Jinping and current Premier Li Keqiang.

Huang indicated that if the “big tiger,” Zhou Yongkang, was not purged, ending the practice of using prisoners’ organs would not have happened. This raises the question: why would two generations of CCP leaders not have been able to stop Zhou Yongkang, an inferior ranking official, from taking organs from prisoners, and only his arrest would be considered a prerequisite to end it?

This infers that the inferior ranking Zhou Yongkang had knowledge about a practice that would give him the power to resist against his superiors. It suggests that not only convicted prisoners were used as organ source but also prisoners of conscience, which amounts to a larger number and a more predictable, steady organ pool than the convicted criminals.

The organ procurement from convicted, executed prisoners could not be ended for over a decade, because admitting executed prisoners as the organ source is to cover up the group of prisoners of conscience as the organ source.Therefore, the organ procurement from prisoners of conscience remains a pressing issue, which has never been admitted by the Chinese officials.